Passivity in Transactional Analysis and the Susceptibility of Users to Cyber Threats

Main Article Content

Zbigniew Łęski
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-6955

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between passivity strategies in transactional analysis
and users’ susceptibility to cyber threats. The main research problem concerned identifying which
passive strategies are most strongly associated with risky online behaviours. The study was con-
ducted in Poland using the CAWI method on a sample of 357 adults. Two tools were employed:
the Passivity Questionnaire (Pierzchała, 2024) and the author’s experimental Cyberthreat Suscep-
tibility Questionnaire (Łęski, 2024). The results revealed statistically significant correlations be-
tween the strategies of Overadaptation and Doing Nothing and susceptibility to cyber threats,
partially confirming the hypothesis that all forms of passivity increase risk. A positive relationship
was also found between the Violence strategy and displaying one’s private life on social media,
which may indicate reduced sensitivity to privacy and a link to sharenting. These findings highlight
the importance of psychological factors in cybersecurity and may inform preventive and educa-
tional initiatives aimed at strengthening users’ digital self-protection competences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research Raports

Author Biography

Zbigniew Łęski, Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa

Pedagogue and psychologist, PhD in Humanities (Pedagogy), Assistant Professor at the Department of Social Research, Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa. Member of the Educational Transactional Analysis Research Team. His research interests focus on human functioning in the world of new technologies, media education, and the social aspects of cybersecurity.

How to Cite

Łęski, Z. (2025). Passivity in Transactional Analysis and the Susceptibility of Users to Cyber Threats. Educational Transactional Analysis, 14, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2025.14.08

References

Al-Badayneh, D., Al-Badayneh, D., & Hashish, R. (2025). Human Factors of Cybersecurity. Journal of Posthumanism. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i4.1242.

Hadlington, L. (2017). Human factors in cybersecurity: Examining the link between Internet addiction, impulsivity, attitudes towards cybersecurity, and risky cybersecurity behaviours. Heliyon, 3(7), e00346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00346

Jagieła, J. (2023). Leksykon pojęć i terminów analizy transakcyjnej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jana Długosza w Częstochowie.

Kennison, S., & Chan-Tin, E. (2020). Taking risks with cybersecurity: Using knowledge and personal characteristics to predict self-reported cybersecurity behaviours. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 546546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.546546

Lahcen, R., Caulkins, B., Mohapatra, R., & Kumar, M. (2020). Review and insight on the behavioural aspects of cybersecurity. Cybersecurity, 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-020-00050-w

Łęski, Z. (2024). The profile of ego states and experiencing positive and negative feelings in the context of vulnerability to cyber threats. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 13, 137–152. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2024.13.08

Nikum, A. (2025). Examining the Human Factors in Cybersecurity Practices: Psychological, Technical, and Organisational Perspectives. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2025/v18i6699.

Pierzchała, A. (2013). Pasywność w szkole. Wydawnictwo AJD w Częstochowie.

Pierzchała, A. (2024). Emotional intelligence and reflexivity vs. passivity in the perspective of transactional analysis: A research report. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 13, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2024.13.11

Parsons, K., Calic, D., Pattinson, M., Butavicius, M., McCormac, A., & Zwaans, T. (2017). The Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q): Two further validation studies. Comput. Secur., 66, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.01.004.

Raywood-Burke, G., Bishop, L.M., Asquith, P.M., Morgan, P.L. (2021). Human Individual Difference Predictors in Cyber-Security: Exploring an Alternative Scale Method and Data Resolution to Modelling Cyber Secure Behavior. In: Moallem, A. (eds) HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12788. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77392-2_15

Wiederhold, B. (2014). The Role of Psychology in Enhancing Cybersecurity. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 17 3, 131-2 . https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.1502.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>