Autopercepcja uzdolnień a wybór profilu studiów w świetle osiągnięć szkolnych i opinii nauczycieli – perspektywa analizy transakcyjnej
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article addresses the internal determinants of students` educational decisions in the context of their high school achievements. The primary objective of the study was to analyze the relationship between the self-perception of abilities and the chosen field of study (humanities vs. engineering). The research was conducted using a diagnostic survey method on a sample of N=1180 students. Statistical analysis revealed that the key predictor of choice is the process of social labeling by teachers (p=0.349). From the perspective of Educational Transactional Analysis (ETA), this process is interpreted as a mechanism for shaping an individual`s educational script through a system of strokes (recognition signs) provided by the teaching staff. The results indicate that the choice of study profile is not merely a function of grades but a realization of an established educational identity, where external attributions transform into internal script mandates.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AUTHOR'S STATEMENT
I am aware that the Educational Transactional Analysis journal is published under a Creative Commons license - Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).
By submitting the article, I agree to make it available under this license
How to Cite
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bourdieu, P. (2005). Dystynkcja: Społeczna krytyka władzy sądzenia. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Bukowski, P. (2020). Student mobility and sorting of students. Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, 303(3), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/125587
Bukowski, P., & Kobus, M. (2012). Educational equality of opportunity in Poland. Ekonomista, 5, 605–627.
Collins, R. (2019). The credential society: An historical sociology of education and stratification. Columbia University Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The „what” and „why” of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Długosz, P. (2017). Strategie życiowe młodzieży na pograniczu polsko-ukraińskim. Zakład Wydawniczy Nomos.
Gromkowska-Melosik, A. (2011). Edukacja i (nie)równość społeczna kobiet: Studium dynamiki dostępu. Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”
Jagieła, J. (2011). Analiza transakcyjna w edukacji. Wydawnictwo AJD.
Kwieciński, Z. (1992). Socjopatologia edukacji. Wydawnictwo Edytor.
Marynowicz-Hetka, E. (2006). Pedagogika społeczna (t. 1). PWN.
Meighan, R. (1993). Socjologia edukacji. Wydawnictwo UMK.
Modrzewski, J. (2007). Socjalizacja i uczestnictwo społeczne: Studium socjopedagogiczne. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Szafraniec, K. (2011). Młodzi 2011. Kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów.
Szelewa, D., & Polakowski, M. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central and
Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928707087589
Szkudlarek, T. (2019). Pedagogika krytyczna. W: Z. Kwieciński, B. Śliwerski (red.), Pedagogika: Podręcznik akademicki (t. 1, s. 363–377). PWN.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934