Building relationships at school by responding to the individual needs of students and teachers using the Process Communication Model®

• Anna Hady

  none

  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0847-6532

The purpose of this article is to present the basic concepts and practical application of the Process Communication Model® in the field of education. PCM® is a psychological personality model developed by the American clinical psychologist Dr. Taibi Kahler (Pauley, J., Bradley, D., Pauley J., 2002, p. xxiii). The model shows how to communicate effectively taking into account different personality types by using communication channels and gives the key to recognizing psychological needs and the resulting individual motivations specific to the base type of personality and phase, i.e. the currently dominant personality type (Kahler, 2008, pp. 45-81, 111–116). Also practical conclusions from the application of the model in the field of education in schools in the USA are presented (Donlan, 2003, pp. 48-49).

1. Anna Hady, none

   Coach and trainer in the area of conscious parenting and building relationships based on respect and understanding. She works in groups and individually with parents, guardians and teachers, supporting families and institutions in building a better understanding with children and developing emotional intelligence. Certified trainer and coach of Process Communiction Model®, trainer of the Familiylab Foundation. She runs a blog on personal development and building healthy relationships (www.annahady.pl/blog)

Akademia Przyszłości (2020), „Raport o dołowaniu” https://akademiaprzyszlosci.org.pl/raport-o-dolowaniu/ (data pobrania 13.11.2020)

Collignon, G. (2017). The Art of adaptive communication. Hot Springs: Kahler Communications, Inc.

Collignon, G., Legrand, P., Parr, J. (2010). Parlez-vous Personality? Process Communication for Coaches. Paris: Kahler Communication Europe.

Donlan, R. Ed.D., (2013) PCM Journal, 1, 45-67, The Process Education Model (PEM): A Catalyst for School Improvement

Gilbert, M. (2018) Student performance is linked to connecting effectively with teachers. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning

Juul J. (2013) Kryzys szkoły. Co możemy zrobić dla uczniów, nauczycieli i rodziców?, Wydawnictwo Mind, Podkowa Leśna

Kahler, T., Capers, H. (1974). The Miniscript. Transactional Analysis Journal, 4 (1), 26–42, https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377400400110.

Kahler, T. (1975). Drivers: The Key to the Process of Scripts. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5 (3), 280–284, https://doi.org/10.1177/036215377500500318.

Kahler, T. (2008). The Process Therapy Model. Little Rock: Taibi Kahler Associates, Inc.

Lefeuvre, J. (2007). Discover Process Communication. Dunod, Paris: Kahler Communication Europe. Ware, P. (1983). Personality Adaptations (Doors to Therapy). Transactional Analysis Journal, 13 (1), 11–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/036215378301300104.

Muse School reportaż https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMg2suPUxIE (pobrano 13.11.2020)

Pauley, J., Bradley, D., Pauley J., (2002). Here’s how to reach me. Matching Instruction to Personality Types in Your Classroom, Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

• pdf

Copyright (c) 2020 Anna Hady

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

I am aware that the Educational Transactional Analysis journal is published under a Creative Commons license - Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).

By submitting the article, I agree to make it available under this license