Educational passivity – from theory to practice: Implications of the studies of educational passivity for the theory and practice of transactional analysis

Educational passivity – from theory to practice

Implications of the studies of educational passivity for the theory and practice of transactional analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2020.09.10

Keywords:

passivity, educational transactional analysis, applied research

Abstract

The article offers a review of “Passivity at school” by Pierzchała (2013) in terms of the implications for theory and practice of transactional analysis. The main findings from the research project were summarised and compared to other studies concerning passivity. Pierzchała’s contribution to theory lies in providing an evidence base for the concepts of passive behaviours by integrating qualitative and quantitative research methods. The practical implications underline the necessity to confront passivity both in teachers and learners, taking account especially of overadaptation that is reinforced systemically. Relevant short case studies illustrate how theoretical discussions can be translated into educational practice

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Piotr Jusik, Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y Cultural, San Pedro, Guatemala

independent researcher affiliated with the Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y Cultural in San Pedro La Laguna in Guatemala. Since 2017 he collaborates with the Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa (Poland) by writing articles and sharing his international experience as a teacher, trainer, transactional analysis counsellor and coach. Piotr holds Qualified Teacher Status in the UK, he is a fully accredited psychotherapist/counsellor by the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, he holds a Level 7 Diploma in Leadership and Executive Coaching from the Institute of Leadership and Management, UK. He is interested in applying transactional analysis in education to address the emotional factors of teaching and learning. Between 2015 – 2020 Piotr designed and led various coaching transactional analysis workshops in Poland, Ukraine, the UK and Guatemala. His particular interest revolves around training teachers in counselling skills. Currently, Piotr works internationally as coach & counsellor and provides educational training and workshops to NGOs in Guatemala. He is in his final stages of becoming a Certified Transactional Analyst in the field of Counselling.

References

Babcock, D. (1975). Teaching Caregivers to Win. Transactional Analysis Jour- nal, 5 (4), 392–395.

Barrow, G. (2009). Teaching, Learning, Schooling, and Script. Transactional Analysis Journal, 39 (4), 298–304.

Berne, E. (1966). Principles of group treatment. New York, NY: Grove Press. Berne, E. (1970). Sex in human loving. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Berne, E. (1971). A layman’s guide to psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Harmond-sworth, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1957).

Campos, L. (1975). Institutional Discount Structures. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5 (1), 60–61.

Edwards, S. (1979). Hyperactivity as Passive Behavior. Transactional Analysis Journal, 9 (1), 60–62.

Erskine, R.E. (1982). Transactional analysis and family therapy. In: A. Home & M. Ohlson (eds.), Family counseling and therapy (pp. 245–275). Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.

Fine, M. (1975). The personal orientation scale for teachers. Kansas: Lawrence. Fine, M., Covell, G., Tracy D. & B. (1978). The Effects of TA Training on Teacher Attitudes and Behavior. Transactional Analysis Journal, 8 (3), 236–239. Garcia, F. (1982). Reactivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 12 (2), 123–126. Hart E. Wayne (1976). Symbiotic Invitations. Transactional Analysis Journal, 6 (3), 253–254.

Hoy, W., Blankenship, J. (1972). A comparison of the ideological orientations and personality characteristics of teacher acceptors and rejectors of BSCS biology. Science Education, 56, 71–77.

Jusik, P. (2017). Formal and Informal Use of TA Counselling in Education. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 6, 67–85.

Mellor, K., Schiff, E. (1975). Discounting. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5 (3), 295–302.

Montuschi, F. (1984). Teacher’s Scripts and In-Service Training Programs. Tran- sactional Analysis Journal, 14 (1), 29–31.

Naughton, M., Tudor, K. (2006). Being White. Transactional Analysis Journal, 36 (2), 159–171.

Pickett, L. (1986). The Integrative Classroom. Transactional Analysis Journal, 16 (4), 241–246.

Pierzchała, A. (2013). Pasywność w szkole: Diagnoza zjawiska z punktu widzenia analizy transakcyjnej. Częstochowa: Wyd. Akademii im. J. Długosza w Czę- stochowie.

Schiff, A., Schiff, J. (1971). Passivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1 (1), 71– 78.

Schiff, J., Schiff, A. (1975). Frames of Reference. Transactional Analysis Jour- nal, 5 (3), 290–294.

Schlegel, L. (1998). What is Transactional Analysis? Transactional Analysis Jo- urnal, 28 (4), 269–287.

Schmid, B. (1994). Transactional analysis and social roles. In: G. Mohr & T. Ste- inert (eds.), Growth and change for organizations: Transactional analysis new developments 1995–2006 (pp. 32–61). Pleasanton, CA: International Transactional Analysis Association.

Schmid, B. (2008). The Role Concept of Transactional Analysis and other Approaches to Personality, Encounter, and Cocreativity for All Professional Fields. Transactional Analysis Journal, 38 (1), 17–30.

School climate profile. Engelwood, Colorado, CFK, Lt., 1973.

Zerin, E., Zerin, M., Cuiran, Z. (1997). A Comparative Study of Chinese and American High School Students’ Responses to Stress under Pressure. Transactional Analysis Journal, 27 (4), 241–255.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Jusik, P. (2020). Educational passivity – from theory to practice: Implications of the studies of educational passivity for the theory and practice of transactional analysis. The Educational Transactional Analysis, (9), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2020.09.10

Issue

Section

Research Raports
Loading...