Reviewing procedure

  1. Submitted papers are initially assessed by the editors of the Journal for compliance with the journal's profile, adherence to the publisher's editorial requirements and general grammatical correctness criteria.
  2. Each of the submitted articles is subjected to the reviewing procedure. The editor-in-chief of the magazine decides about the beginning of the procedure.
  3. The text complying with the requirements is anonymized and directed to two independent reviewers. In accordance with the principle of double-blind review, the author and the reviewer are anonymous to each other.
  4. When selecting reviewers, it is ensured that:
    • The reviewer had no prior knowledge of the submission
    • The reviewer has not cooperated recently with the author
    • The reviewers are not from the same institution
  5. By completing the review form electronically, each of the reviewers makes a substantive evaluation of the article involving, inter alia, the compliance with the Journal's profile, originality of the article, its methodological, linguistic and editorial correctness.
  6. After completing the review, the reviewers present their recommendation and critical comments which decide whether the article should or should not be accepted for further publishing work.
  7. After receiving the reviews, they are sent electronically to the authors.
  8. The editor-in-chief makes the final decision concerning publishing of the article.