‘IMAGE SCHEMA’, ‘DOMAIN’, ‘FRAME’ AND ‘MENTAL SPACE’ – TAXONOMY OR AN INTERTWINING NETWORK?

Jolanta Mazurkiewicz-Sokołowska

Autor

Słowa kluczowe:

image schema, domain, frame, mental space, taxonomy, network.

Abstrakt

This paper deals with the question of whether the conceptual structures: ‘image schema’, ‘domain’, ‘frame’ and ‘mental space’ constitute a taxonomy with ‘image schema’ at the top (as the highly schematic item) and ‘mental space’ at the bottom (as the highly specific one) or if they rather defy such classification creating an intertwining network of constructs. It is shown here that depending on contents: (i) ‘domain’, ‘frame’ and ‘mental space’ may fulfil the restrictions of such taxonomy, (ii) only ‘two of them may meet the restrictions, (iii) ‘domain’, ‘frame’ and ‘mental space’ may present the same level of schematicity/specificity, (iv) only two of them may present such equal level. It is argued for a dual nature of the ‘image schema’ which as autonomous and separate structures at the same time, are capable of being incorporated in every domain, frame and mental space as their background, rather than a construct containing them. This theoretical issue is discussed in relation to the concept SUCCESS and processes of mental integration involving image schemas like OBJECT, CONTAINER, PATH, LINK, PART-WHOLE. 

Bibliografia

Bartsch, R. (2002). Consciousness emerging: The dynamics of perception, imagination, action, memory, thought and language. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Beishenova, Z.A., Khabibullaeva, N.Z., Keldibekova, A.S., Naimanova, C.A., & Dzhumalieva, G. K. (2024). From linguistics to psychology: The concept of “success” in English culture through the prism of intentionality and healthy lifestyle. BIO Web of Conferences, 120, 01069, 1–9. https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/pdf/2024/39/bioconf_mbfa2024_01069.pdf.

De Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J.R., & Aransaez, C.P. (1997–1998). Conceptual schemas as propositional idealized cognitive models: In search of a unified framework for the analysis of knowledge organization. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica, 23–24, 257–270.

Fauconnier, G. (n.d.). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. MIT Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration network. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.

Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Linguistics in the morning calm. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp. 111–137).

Hanshin Publishing Company.

Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quadernidi Semantica, 6, 222–254.

Hampe, B. (2005). Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–14). Mouton de Gruyter.

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press.

Noordzij, M., van der Lubbe, R.H. J., & Postma, A. (2005). Strategic and automatic components in the processing of linguistic spatial relations. Acta Psychologica, 119(1), 1–20.

Schwarz, M. (1992). Kognitive Semantiktheorie und neuropsychologische Realität: Repräsentationale und prozedurale Aspekte der semantischen Kompetenz. Niemeyer.

Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100.

Sources

chatgtp.com

https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/

Opublikowane

25.03.2026