Jak dobrze uczniowie opanowują umiejętność wspólnego rozwiązywania problemów w zadaniach matematycznych (przypadek Indonezji)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16926/p.2022.31.02Abstrakt
Celem artykułu jest ocena umiejętności wspólnego rozwiązywania problemów uczniów
gimnazjów z przedmiotu matematyka z zastosowaniem metody dydaktycznej wspólnego
rozwiązywania problemów. Umiejętność ta jest jedną z ważniejszych w odniesieniu do wymagań
indonezyjskiego programu nauczania przedmiotu z 2013 roku. Jest ona traktowana jako kluczowa
umiejętność w obliczu wymogów globalnej konkurencyjności.
Umiejętność wspólnego rozwiązywania problemów jest jednym z głównych wyzwań XXI wieku –
na pierwszym miejscu stawia wiedzę, musi ona jednak harmonizować z nabytymi dyspozycjami
społecznymi, które zapewnią sukces w grupie roboczej. Badanie przeprowadzono w SMP NEGERI
2 Telaga, gimnazjum państwowym w prowincji Gorontalo w Indonezji w roku szkolnym
2020/2021.
W badaniu zastosowano podejście ilościowe z wykorzystaniem testów. Wyniki pokazały, że
umiejętności uczniów były umiarkowane w zakresie wspólnego rozwiązywania problemów,
a mianowicie: budowanie i zarządzanie relacjami wzajemności i zrozumienia osiągnęło wartość
11 682, podejmowanie działań lub strategii w celu rozwiązywania problemów było na poziomie
10 219, a budowania zespołu i zarządzania nimi na poziomie 12 864 odpowiedzi
Bibliografia
Aini, I. N. (2013). Meningkatkan Literasi Matematis Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Matematis. Thesis Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung: Unpublished.
Boaler, Jo. (2008). What’s Math Got to Do with It?: How Teachers and Parents Can Transform Mathematics Learning and Inspire Success. Penguin Books.
Boas, R.P. (1990). George Pólya, 1887–1985: A Biographical Memoir. Retrieved from http://www.nasonline.org/publications/biographical-memoirs/memoir-pdfs/polya-george.pdf
Cellis, W. (1993). New teaching method puts math in real life. New York Times
Chinn, C., A. O’Donnell and T. Jinks. (2000). The Structure of Discourse in Collaborative Learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 77–97, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600650
Degner, K. & Fi, C., & (2012). Teaching through Problem Solving. Mathematics Teacher,105(6), 455-459.
Fiore. S. M; Carter. D. R; & Asencio. R. (2015). Conflict, Trust, and Cohesion: Examining Affective and Attitudinal Factors in Science Teams. In E. Salas, W. B. Vessey, & A. X. Estrada (Eds.) Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice, 271-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1534-085620150000017011
Graham,T.,Sharp.J., &Maull, M. (1999). Bridge building: A practical mathematics task. Retrieved from The Mathematical Association Website http://www.m a.org.uk/docs/library/2071.pdf
Graesser. Arthur C; Stephen M. Fiore; Samuel Greiff. (2018). Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(2), 59-92, https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618808244
Graesser. A; & Foltz. P. (2013). The PISA 2015 Collaborative Problem Solving Framework. Paper Presented at the 2013 Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference. Madison, WI
Griffin, P. (2017). Assessing and teaching 21st century skills: Collaborative problem solving as a case study. In A. A. von Davier, M. Zhu, & P. C. Kyllonen (Eds.), Innovative assessment of collaboration . Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Häkkinen. P; Järvelä. S; Mäkitalo-Siegl. K; Ahonen. A; Näykki. P; & Valtonen. T. (2016). Preparing Teacher-students for Twenty-first century Learning Practices (PREP 21): A Framework for Enhancing Collaborative Problem-solving and Strategic Learning Skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772
Harding S-ME, Griffin PE, Awwal N, Alom BM, Scoular C. Measuring Collaborative Problem Solving Using Mathematics-Based Tasks. AERA Open. July 2017. doi:10.1177/2332858417728046
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer
Hill, H.C., Rowan, and Ball, D. (2016). Effect of Teachers Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42.
Hoover, M., et. al. (2016). Making Progress on Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. TME, 13(1), 52–70.
Kusaeri and Ridho, Ali. (2019). Learning Outcome of Mathematics and Science: Features of Indonesian Madrasah Students. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23, 1.
Levy. F; & Murnane. R. J. (2013). Trends in Routine and Non-routine Tasks in Occupations, United States, 1960 to 2009 [Figure]. Dancing with Robots: Human Skills for Computerized Work.
Lindquist, M., Philpot, R., Mullis, I. V. S., & Cotter, K. E. (2017). TIMSS 2019 Mathematics Framework. In I. V. S. Mullis & M. O. Martin (Eds.), TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/
Liu. O. L; Bridgeman. B; & Adler. R. M. (2012). Measuring Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Motivation Matters. Educational Researcher, 41(9), 352-362, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12459679
Lomibao, L. S. (2016). Enhancing mathematics teachers‟ quality through Lesson Study. SpringerPlus 5:1590. DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3215-0
Luckin, R., Baines, E., Cukurova, M., Holmes, W., and Mann, M. (2017). Solved! Making the case for collaborative problems. https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/solved-making-casecollaborative-problem-solving.pdf
Ministry of Education and Culture Regulation (2014). Permendikbud No. 103/2014 tentang: Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemdikbud RI.
Mirza, Anusha and Hussain, Nasreen. (2014). Motivating Learning in Mathematics through Collaborative Problem Solving: A Focus on using Rich Tasks. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 1(1), 21-31
Nizam. (2016). Ringkasan Hasil-hasil Asesmen Belajar Dari Hasil UN, PISA, TIMSS, INAP. Retrieved May 12, 2021, from https://www.scribd.com/docum ent/403325166/Nizam-Hasil Penilaian-seminar-puspendik2016-pdf
Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 645- 656.
Nolan, B., Dempsey, M., & Lovatt, J. (2015). Developing Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) for pre-service teachers: a study of students’ developing thinking in relation to the teaching of mathematics. In Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics (Vol. 35, pp. 54–59).
Norton, S. (2018). Middle School Pre- Service Teachers’ Mathematics Content Knowledge and Mathematical Pedagogy Content Knowledge: Assessing and Relating. Making Waves, Opening Spaces (Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia), 599–606.
Nurhayati, I. N. (2014). Meningkatkan Literasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Model-Eliciting Activities. Thesis Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung: Unpublished.
O’Brien, M. (2005).Cooperative learning in the maths classroom. Retrieved from http://www.otrnet.com.au/Presentations/presentations.html
OECD. (2013). Draft PISA 2015 Mathematics Framework. Paris, France: OECD. OECD. (2014).
Peterson, Jill. (2019). Engaging and motivating students in mathematics through collaborative problem solving. Te Whai Toi Tangata, Institute of Professional Learning.
Pólya, George (2004). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Retrieved from http://math.hawaii.edu/home/pdf/putnam/PolyaHowToSolveIt.pdf
Prahmana, Rully Charitas Indra. (2017). Mathematics instruction, problems, challenges and opportunities: a case study in Manokwari Regency, Indonesia. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 15(3).
Reys, R., et al. (2009). Helping children learn mathematics, 9th ed. United Stated: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Rosa, M. and Orey, D. C. (2011). Ethnomathematics: the cultural aspects of mathematics. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 4(2). 32-54.
Sari, Delsika Pramata. (2015). The Role of Researchers to Improve Mathematical Literacy In Indonesia. Proceeding International Seminar on Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education 28 M MATH-07065
Silbey, Robyn. (2016). Collaborative Problem Solving: Students Talk Their Way Into Problem-Solving Success. Mc Graw Hill Education. Retrieved from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/ecommerce-prod.mheducation.com/unitas/school/explore/sites/glencoe-math/research/glencoe-math-collaborative-problem-solving.pdf
Sinay, E., & Nahornick, A. (2016). Teaching and learning mathematics research series l: Effective instructional strategies. (Research Report No. 16/17-08). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto District School Board.
Tarmizi, R. A., & Bayat, S. (2012). Collaborative Problem-Based Learning in Mathematics: A Cognitive Load Perspective. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 344-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.051
Umar, Bahariyah; Budi Jatmiko; Raharjo. (2018). Development of Natural Science Learning Instruments with Contextual Approach Using Problem Solving Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skill of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v7n2.p1501-1506
von Davier, A. A., & Halpin, P. F. (2013). Collaborative problem solving assessments and the assessment of cognitive skills: Psychometric considerations (Research Report 12-41). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Yurniwati and Hanum, Latipa. (2017). Improving Mathematics Achievement of Indonesian 5th Grade Students through Guided Discovery Learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 77-84
Zevenbergen, R., Sullivan, O., &Mousley, J. (2003).The contexts of mathematics tasks and the context of the classroom:Are we including all students? Mathematics Enhancement Research Journal, 15 (2),107-121.
