Structure and Content of Values in the Context of Humanization of the Educational Environment of the Institution of Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16926/Keywords:
humanism, management, educational process, higher education institution, valueAbstract
The article examines the structure and content of values in the context of humanization of the educational environment of a higher education institution. The importance of humanistic values in the formation of academic space is revealed. It is shown that values are the basis of the world outlook, determine behavioral attitudes and are a major factor in the interaction between all par-
ticipants in the educational process. The authors presented the hierarchical pyramid of values. Particular attention is paid to the typologies of educational values, which covers normative-legal, intra-institutional, pedagogical, managerial, didactic, upbringing, social, reflecting the needs of modern society and the labor market. The results of experimental research are presented that
demonstrate the values of modern higher education. It is emphasized that values have a dynamic nature, change under the influence of individual experience, social environment and global events. It is concluded that the humanization of the educational process is possible only in the conditions of conscious management, which relies on the system of values aimed at the develop-
ment of a human -centric organizational culture of further scientific search requires justification of modern methods of formation of humanistic values during the educational process
References
Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (2nd ed., T. Irwin, trans.). Hackett Publishing.
Aung, Y.M. (2020). Humanism and education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 7(5), 13555–13561.
Blihar, V.S. (2010). The hierarchy of values as a vitally important principle in personality formation. Military Scientific Bulletin, 13, 198–207.
Chałubiński, M. (2006). Marii Ossowskiej nauka o moralności a jej wizje społeczne. Principia, 45–46, 43–56.
Czarnecki, P. (2006). Marii Ossowskiej nauka o moralności. Warszawa: Kompas II. https://philpapers.org/rec/CZAMON
Encyclopedia.com. (n.d.). Values. In: Encyclopedia of Sociology. Retrieved May 21, 2025, from https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/sociology-and-social-reform/sociology-general-terms-and-concepts/values.
Gill, S., Niens, U. (Eds.). (2016). Education as humanisation: Dialogic pedagogy and transformative learning. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Education-as-Humanisation/Gill-Niens/p/book/9781138824844
Hałas, E. (2010). Towards the World Culture Society: Florian Znaniecki’s Culturalism. https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=MSBHuJRF80oC&redir_esc=y
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, trans.).Blackwell. http://pdf-objects.com/files/Heidegger-Martin-Being-and-Time-trans.-Macquarrie-Robinson-Blackwell-1962.pdf
Schwartz, S.H., Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal structure and
content of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878–889.
Sartre, J.-P. (1994). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology (translated by V. Lyakh, P. Tarashchuk). Kyiv: Osnovy.
Steinert, S. (2023). Interdisciplinary Value Theory. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10733-7.
Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. https://www.academia.edu/8012463/THE_METHODOLOGY_OF_THE_Social_Sciences
Wiśniewski, R. (2009). Problemy i drogi hierarchizowania wartości. In: D. Ślęczek-Czakon, M. Wojewoda (eds.), Wartości – tradycja i współczesność (pp. 98–105). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Wróblewska, H. (2024). Integracja potencjału środowisk na rzecz promowania pozytywnego modelu edukacji otwartej na różnorodność. Kontekst tutoringu akademickiego. Podstawy Edukacji, 17, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.16926/pe.2024.17.03
