Between Algorithm and Authenticity. Educational Transactional Analysis in Research on TikTok Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article proposes a theoretical and methodological integration of Educational Transactional Analysis (ETA) into research on informal learning on TikTok. While existing studies focus on technology acceptance models, nano-learning behaviours, and reverse socialisation, they lack a psychodynamic and relational understanding of how learners interact with algorithmic environments. Drawing on desk research of recent empirical studies (2024–2026), the article identifies a significant research gap: the absence of qualitative analysis of ego states, transactions, psychological hungers, life positions, and games in TikTok-based learning. The author argues that TikTok’s recommendation algorithm functions as a surrogate Parent ego state, that user–algorithm interactions constitute crossed and ulterior transactions, and that the platform predominantly satisfies the hunger for stimulation while leaving the hunger for structure unmet. The article concludes with a proposal for an empirical qualitative study and outlines practical implications for media educators.
Translations of this article
Downloads
Article Details
Data Availability Statement
Nie udostępniono.
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AUTHOR'S STATEMENT
I am aware that the Educational Transactional Analysis journal is published under a Creative Commons license - Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).
By submitting the article, I agree to make it available under this license
How to Cite
References
Adamczyk, K. (2026). TikTok jako przestrzeń nieformalnej socjalizacji młodzieży: implikacje pedagogiczne. Problemy Opiekuńczo-Wychowawcze, 647(2), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.71358/pow.2887
Ang, E., Abalos, M. A., Seril, J. L., Uy, K. M., Silvestre, F. M., Ebardo, R., Tuazon, J. B., & Pulumbarit, A. (2025). Analyzing the factors affecting nano-learning behavior of college students on TikTok. in: B. Jiang et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. https://library.apsce.net/index.php/ICCE/article/view/6028/5958
Berne, E. (1961). Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy. Grove Press.
Dhondt, B., Van de Sompel, D., & Hudders, L. (2026). From For You to the family table: Adolescent consumer learning and reverse socialization on TikTok. New Media & Society, (1–27). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261443533
Dziekońska, J. (2025). Zabawa rówieśnicza w transformacji: od podwórkowego „berka” do internetowego „challenge’u”. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 14, 329–344. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2025.14.18
Feiyue, X., Mohamad Ali, A. Z. bin, & Qi, L. (2025). Exploring the Enablers of Voluntary Educational Usage of Douyin (TikTok) Among University Students in China. Sage Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251388706
Jagieła, J. (2025). Student Personality Adaptations, Part III. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 14, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2025.14.01
Łęski, Z. (2025) Pasywność w ujęciu analizy transakcyjnej a podatność użytkowników na cyberzagrożenia, Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 14, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2025.14.08.
Plaskura, P. (2025). Edukacja W Dobie Generatywnej Sztucznej Inteligencji: Perspektywa Analizy Transakcyjnej. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 14, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2025.14.02
White, A. (2025). Demand contracts. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna, 14, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.16926/eat.2025.14.05
Wusylko, C., Weisberg, L., Opoku, R. A., Abramowitz, B., Williams, J., Xing, W (2024). Using machine learning techniques to investigate learner engagement with TikTok media literacy campaigns. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2266518