THE CONCEPT OF WAR IN POETIC WORKS: CRITERIA AND SPECIFICITIES OF STYLISTIC AND SEMANTIC-LEXICAL ANALYSIS
Olena Gonchar
Słowa kluczowe:
war concept poetry, lexical-stylistic analysis, criterion, paradigm, amateur poets, Russo-Ukrainian warAbstrakt
This scientific article focuses on the lack of research on the lexical-and-stylistic analysis of war-themed poems written by non-professional authors. Defining methodological foundations and specific criteria, and analyzing war-concept poetry are its two major tasks. It introduces a specific analytical approach tailored to the examination of poetic works created by amateur authors who are ordinary residents from regions of Ukraine subjected to bombings during the initial stages of the war. The article seeks to shed light on the unique perspectives of non-professional authors expressing their encounters with war through poetry, which contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of war concept poetry, which tends to assume a documentary-like character.
Bibliografia
Primary sources
Гончар, О., Більдер, Г., Коваль, О., Лігачова, А., Мархайчук, Н., Рогоза, О., Суховій, О., Тарасов, В., & Гончар, О. (Ред.). (2017). Соціально-гуманітарний дискурс у системі художньої комунікації: Монографічне дослідження. Харків: ХДАДМ.
Мачулін, Л. (2022). Національні архетипи як модус поезії спротиву в російсько-українській війні. Культура України, 77, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.077.02.
Слов’янин (2022). Літературно-художне видання, 43. Харків.
Слов’янин (2022). Літературно-художне видання, 44. Харків.
Ожегов, С. (2019). Толковый словарь русского языка. Л. Скворцов (Ред.). Оникс-ЛИТ, Мир и Образование.
Шинкарук, В. І. (Ред.). (2002). Філософський енциклопедичний словник. Київ: Абрис.
Шмитт, К. (1992). Понятие политического. Вопросы социологии, 1, 35–67. Степанченко, И., Гончар Е., Мирошниченко, М., Нестеренко, К., Оробинская, М., Просяник, О., & Степанченко И. (Ред.). (2016). С. Есенин и его окружение: А. Мариенгоф – Н. Клюев – С. Клычков. Сопоставительный анализ лексики: Коллективная монография (стр. 52–97). Харьков.
Степанченко, И. (1991). Поэтический язык Сергея Есенина (анализ лексики). Харьков: ХГПИ.
References
Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
Cap, P. (2013). Proximization Theory and Critical Discourse Studies: A Promising Connection? International Review of Pragmatics, 5, 293–317.
https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-13050208.
Davis, M. (1983). Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy: Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1), 113–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113. hdl:10983/25968.
Dijk van, T.A. (1998). New(s) Racism: A Discourse analytical approach. In: S. Cottle (ed.), Ethnic Minorities in the Media: Changing Cultural Boundaries (pp. 2–16). London: Routledge.
Evans, M. (2018). Style and chronology: A stylometric investigation of Aphra Behn’s dramatic style and the dating of The Young King. Language and Literature, 27(2), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947018772505.
Folejewski, Z. (1951). Polish Poetry during the Last War. American Slavic and East European Review, 10(3), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/
2491512. Gershkovich, E., Matthew, M. How the Letter Z Became a Russian Pro-War Symbol. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20220307235037 on March 8, 2022.
Gonchar, O., Bіlder, G., Koval, O., Lіgachova, A., Markhaichuk, N., Rogoza, O., Sukhovіi, O., Tarasov, V., & Gonchar, O. (eds.). (2017). Sotsіalno-gumanіtarnii diskurs u sistemі khudozhnoї komunіkatsії: Monografіchne doslіdzhennya. [Social-humanitarian discourse in the system of artistic communication: A monographic study]. Kharkіv: KhDADM.
Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472593580.
Humboldt, W. von. (1988). On Language: The Diversity of Human Language. Structure and its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind (Texts in German Philosophy). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Husserl, E., & Lauer, Q. (1956). Philosophy as a strict science. CrossCurrents, 6(3), 227–246. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24456675.
Jacobs, A. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 186. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186.
Langacker, R. (2006) English: meaning and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Machulin, L. (2022). National archetypes as a modus of resistance poetry in Russian-Ukrainian war. Kultura Ukrainy, 77, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.077.02.
Machulin, L. (ed.). (2022). Literaturno-khudozhniy zhurnal “Slovyanyin”, 43. Kharkiv.
Machulin, L. (ed.). (2022). Literaturno-khudozhniy zhurnal “Slovyanyin”, 44. Kharkiv.
McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Conquest. New York, NY: Routledge.
Normudova, N. (2018). Linguistic personality in the light of anthropocentric paradigm: Basic notion, best practices, challenges and perspectives. LangLit: An International Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal, 4(3), 28–36.
Ozhegov, S. (2019). Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo yazyka. L. Skvorcov (ed.). [Explanatory Russian-Russian dictionary] Oniks-LIT, Mir i Obrazovanie.
Progovac, L. (2014). War, Language and Metaphors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reichelt, S., & Durham, M. (2017). Adjective Intensification as a Means of Characterization: Portraying In-Group Membership and Britishness in
Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Journal of English Linguistics, 45(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424216669747.
Ricoeur, P. (1974). The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics. Northwestern University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183745.
Schmitt, C. (1992). Poniatie politicheskogo [The Concept of the Political]. Voprosy sotsiologii, 1, 35–67.
Semino, E. (2010). Cognitive Poetics and War Poetry: A Corpus-Based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shinkaruk, V. (Red.). (2002). Fіlosofskii yentsiklopedichnii slovnik. [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Kiїv: Abris.
Stepanchenko, I., Gonchar O., Miroshnichenko, M., Nesterenko, K., Orobinskaya, M., Prosyanik, O., & Stepanchenko, I. (eds.). (2016). S. Yesenin
i yego okruzhenie: A. Mariengof – N. Klyuev – S. Klichkov. Sopostavitelnii analiz leksiki: Kollektivnaya monografiya (pp. 52–97). [S. Yesenin and his entourage: A. Mariengoff – N. Klyuyev – S. Klychkov. Comparative analysis of the vocabulary: Collective monograph]. Kharkov.
Stepanchenko, I. (1991). Poeticheskii yazik Sergeya Yesenina (analiz leksiki). [The poetic language of Sergei Yesenin: an analysis of vocabulary]. Kharkov: KhGPI.
Stockwell, P. (2005) Cognitive Poetics: An introduction. Taylor and Francis eLibrary. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/5442300/Cogni
tive_poetics?auto=download&email.
Verdonk, P. (2002). Stylistics. Oxford Introductions to Language Study Text. Series Editor H.G. Widdowson. Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Culture through Key Words: English, Russian, Polish and Japanese. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
